On January 8, UBC filed its Reply. A copy is uploaded to the Documents tab.
In general, UBC continues to argue this matter should be dismissed. It argues this case is moot because policies have been changed; it also continues to assert that I and certain other Class Members not personally assaulted by Mordvinov do not have grounds to pursue a complaint, while Student B was victimized by him off-campus and thus, out of UBC’s zone of responsibility. (It ignores his sexual harassment of her at Green College.) It also objects to various legal arguments made in my Response and claims I am introducing new arguments.
We have not filed a Sur-Reply to date. At this point the ball is back in the court of the Tribunalmember to consider our filings.
Glynnis Kirchmeier - and - Kirchmeier obo Others v. UBC 